Over-Quoting Statistics Task 2 Trap
Task 2 · Lexical Resource · May 2026
Direct answer
The over-quoting-statistics trap is filling Task 2 with precise-sounding numbers that are unverifiable, unrelated, or unsupported. Examiners cap Task Response and Lexical Resource when data does not prove the claim-or when invented stats break credibility. One accurate, linked example beats five vague percentages.
How to spot over-quoting
Fake precision 73.6% with no source or sample
Data dump Three stats, zero explanation
Prompt mismatch Stats about economy on social essay
Statistic traps that cap TR/LR
| Trap | Why it fails |
|---|---|
| Invented survey | Examiner doubts truth |
| Round numbers | Looks fabricated |
| List of % | No argument link |
Use data only when it proves the claim
Prefer qualitative examples or one verifiable pattern. Read disconnected examples and topic sentence traps.
Key takeaways
- Never invent statistics-examiners reward plausible, linked support.
- One explained trend beats five naked percentages.
- If you cite a number, say what it proves in the next sentence.
- Cut stats you cannot explain under examiner follow-up.
FAQ
No-clear argument with well-used examples beats fake data.
Use hedged language (many, a large share) or drop the number and explain the trend.
No-invented precision often hurts credibility; use cautious, linked claims instead.
See whether invented stats or weak links cap your Task 2 score.
Get Writing Reality Check →